<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just The Facts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2010/02/7453/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2010/02/7453/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t drink the Kol-Aid - See a Different Game</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:16:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2010/02/7453/comment-page-1/#comment-21359</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=7453#comment-21359</guid>
		<description>Can this team be saved before it&#039;s too late? Please lock up the youngsters for the next 3 years.  We will have to ride it out over the next few years together it seems. The only problem is I will be 3 years older.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can this team be saved before it&#8217;s too late? Please lock up the youngsters for the next 3 years.  We will have to ride it out over the next few years together it seems. The only problem is I will be 3 years older.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2010/02/7453/comment-page-1/#comment-21358</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=7453#comment-21358</guid>
		<description>More allegations of tax fraud imputed in the briefs. If true the Dodgers will have new owners in less than 3 years. According to Dodger Divorce, Franks is deducting the principle portion of the debt payments.  If true that can only happen with an ESOP (which we know does not exist) or a basis boost tax strategy, most of which are illegal.  The plot thickens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More allegations of tax fraud imputed in the briefs. If true the Dodgers will have new owners in less than 3 years. According to Dodger Divorce, Franks is deducting the principle portion of the debt payments.  If true that can only happen with an ESOP (which we know does not exist) or a basis boost tax strategy, most of which are illegal.  The plot thickens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just The Facts &#124; Dodgers Baseball Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2010/02/7453/comment-page-1/#comment-21357</link>
		<dc:creator>Just The Facts &#124; Dodgers Baseball Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=7453#comment-21357</guid>
		<description>[...] View full post on LADodgerTalk.com - Get Your Daily Dodger Juice, Dodger News and Dodger Rumors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View full post on LADodgerTalk.com &#8211; Get Your Daily Dodger Juice, Dodger News and Dodger Rumors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2010/02/7453/comment-page-1/#comment-21356</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=7453#comment-21356</guid>
		<description>Nice try OD. Not gonna bite. I know you have been around lurking in the weeds. It is where you live.

On that same divorce site is a list of the McFrankenjamie&#039;s team of lawyers. It&#039;s a who&#039;s who of high profile celebrity legal eagles and is no doubt costing each of them thousands per hour. What a waste, spending Dodger money on lawyers.

Andruw Jones. Not exactly one of Jed&#039;s shining moments is it.

Yep, not much else to talk about yet.

So let&#039;s review the latest top 50 prospects:

http://mlb.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?topic_id=7962336

Dodgers with two in the top 50. Giants with two in the top 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice try OD. Not gonna bite. I know you have been around lurking in the weeds. It is where you live.</p>
<p>On that same divorce site is a list of the McFrankenjamie&#8217;s team of lawyers. It&#8217;s a who&#8217;s who of high profile celebrity legal eagles and is no doubt costing each of them thousands per hour. What a waste, spending Dodger money on lawyers.</p>
<p>Andruw Jones. Not exactly one of Jed&#8217;s shining moments is it.</p>
<p>Yep, not much else to talk about yet.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s review the latest top 50 prospects:</p>
<p><a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?topic_id=7962336" rel="nofollow">http://mlb.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?topic_id=7962336</a></p>
<p>Dodgers with two in the top 50. Giants with two in the top 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

