<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the Difference Between the Dodgers and a Catfish?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/12/what-the-difference-between-the-dodgers-and-a-catfish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/12/what-the-difference-between-the-dodgers-and-a-catfish/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t drink the Kol-Aid - See a Different Game</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:28:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/12/what-the-difference-between-the-dodgers-and-a-catfish/comment-page-1/#comment-19347</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=6795#comment-19347</guid>
		<description>One thing that I have not seen any discussion about is the possibility that the Dodgers have had budget constraints for years and that they intentionally saved costs in 2009 by promising, verbally or in their contract, to not offer either Wolf or Hudson arbitration after the 2009 season, thus allowing the players the possibility of a higher salary offer by all teams in 2010 and allowing the Dodgers to pay less to the player in 2009.

You never know what cheapness has, is, or will occur wiht the Dodgers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that I have not seen any discussion about is the possibility that the Dodgers have had budget constraints for years and that they intentionally saved costs in 2009 by promising, verbally or in their contract, to not offer either Wolf or Hudson arbitration after the 2009 season, thus allowing the players the possibility of a higher salary offer by all teams in 2010 and allowing the Dodgers to pay less to the player in 2009.</p>
<p>You never know what cheapness has, is, or will occur wiht the Dodgers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/12/what-the-difference-between-the-dodgers-and-a-catfish/comment-page-1/#comment-19346</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=6795#comment-19346</guid>
		<description>Dodger contracts should no longer include no trade clauses, but should include real estate buyout insurance so that if a player is traded then they have the option of requiring that thier home be purchased at a price no lower than their acqusition price when the player and their family leaves.  

The Dodgers need to load up on players that can either perform or be traded next summer.  

Franks has a fiduciary responsibility to the marital estate to maintain the value of the community assets, including Beans&#039; quasi-community property interest, in the value of the Dodgers.  Beans -  please go to Family Law Court and ask the Judge to require Franks to maintain the value of the Dodgers (by putting a similar caliber team om the field as in 2009) until a ruling is made on the ownership and allocation of the Dodger team value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dodger contracts should no longer include no trade clauses, but should include real estate buyout insurance so that if a player is traded then they have the option of requiring that thier home be purchased at a price no lower than their acqusition price when the player and their family leaves.  </p>
<p>The Dodgers need to load up on players that can either perform or be traded next summer.  </p>
<p>Franks has a fiduciary responsibility to the marital estate to maintain the value of the community assets, including Beans&#8217; quasi-community property interest, in the value of the Dodgers.  Beans &#8211;  please go to Family Law Court and ask the Judge to require Franks to maintain the value of the Dodgers (by putting a similar caliber team om the field as in 2009) until a ruling is made on the ownership and allocation of the Dodger team value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/12/what-the-difference-between-the-dodgers-and-a-catfish/comment-page-1/#comment-19345</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=6795#comment-19345</guid>
		<description>4.  Sign 22 players to the empty AAA roster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4.  Sign 22 players to the empty AAA roster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/12/what-the-difference-between-the-dodgers-and-a-catfish/comment-page-1/#comment-19344</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=6795#comment-19344</guid>
		<description>Here is my gooder plan

1. Sign Milton, Weaver, Belliard and Eychart (Payroll = 90 mil)
2. Sign Wolf to 2-Yrs $15 mil plus incentives, sell Stults to Japan
3. Sign Padilla 1-Yr $ 5 mil plus incentives, Sell Repko to Japan
4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my gooder plan</p>
<p>1. Sign Milton, Weaver, Belliard and Eychart (Payroll = 90 mil)<br />
2. Sign Wolf to 2-Yrs $15 mil plus incentives, sell Stults to Japan<br />
3. Sign Padilla 1-Yr $ 5 mil plus incentives, Sell Repko to Japan<br />
4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

