<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dateline &#8211; October 4, 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/12/dateline-october-4-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/12/dateline-october-4-2010/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t drink the Kol-Aid - See a Different Game</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:59:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jdavis</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/12/dateline-october-4-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-19854</link>
		<dc:creator>Jdavis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=6941#comment-19854</guid>
		<description>Ethier is not a .300 hitter, even if he bats 3rd in the lineup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethier is not a .300 hitter, even if he bats 3rd in the lineup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Dodger</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/12/dateline-october-4-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-19849</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Dodger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=6941#comment-19849</guid>
		<description>This is the &quot;hot stove&quot; time of the year.  And Mark sees the hot stats for next year -- and they are always glowing.  Nothing wrong in that.

I see Ethier hitting .300 or more next year.  Mark does not because he still cannot get over Andre developing faster and better than Martin.  Oh, the struggles within one&#039;s soul.

So Mark talks Ethier down and Martin up.  That is okay, because this is &quot;hot stove&quot; time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the &#8220;hot stove&#8221; time of the year.  And Mark sees the hot stats for next year &#8212; and they are always glowing.  Nothing wrong in that.</p>
<p>I see Ethier hitting .300 or more next year.  Mark does not because he still cannot get over Andre developing faster and better than Martin.  Oh, the struggles within one&#8217;s soul.</p>
<p>So Mark talks Ethier down and Martin up.  That is okay, because this is &#8220;hot stove&#8221; time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steevo17</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/12/dateline-october-4-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-19845</link>
		<dc:creator>steevo17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=6941#comment-19845</guid>
		<description>I like the optimism Mark. One minor adjustment, in my opinion is needed...

Kershaw and Billingsley should be reversed as far their 2010 stats. I really think Bills is ready for a breakout season. He&#039;s at the age which is most likely, as opposed to Kershaw. Plus he has to be intent on redeeming himself over his lack of production and consequent demotion last season. I look for Bills to return to his rightful spot at the top of the Dodger rotation.

Kershaw will continue to grow and while I would not be surprised at 18+ wins, I don&#039;t expect it for two very big reasons: #1 - I think the front office will restrict his innings again this year, and most likely the next 2 years, to 150-175 IP. This makes sense because of his tender age. He should not be extended at any cost in my opinion. #2 - I don&#039;t think he&#039;s ready for a breakout year anyways. The production we received this season was a great gift, but he still very young and inexperienced. To place such lofty expectations on a 22 year old is unrealistic. 

Although...Fernando was only 21 in 1982 and went 19-12 with a 2.87 ERA, while pitching 285 innings (WOW!) in 37 starts. I can&#039;t see Kershaw recreating that type of season, but it could happen.

Keep up the great posts everybody, this is the best Dodger fan site anywhere. Happy Holidays to everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the optimism Mark. One minor adjustment, in my opinion is needed&#8230;</p>
<p>Kershaw and Billingsley should be reversed as far their 2010 stats. I really think Bills is ready for a breakout season. He&#8217;s at the age which is most likely, as opposed to Kershaw. Plus he has to be intent on redeeming himself over his lack of production and consequent demotion last season. I look for Bills to return to his rightful spot at the top of the Dodger rotation.</p>
<p>Kershaw will continue to grow and while I would not be surprised at 18+ wins, I don&#8217;t expect it for two very big reasons: #1 &#8211; I think the front office will restrict his innings again this year, and most likely the next 2 years, to 150-175 IP. This makes sense because of his tender age. He should not be extended at any cost in my opinion. #2 &#8211; I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s ready for a breakout year anyways. The production we received this season was a great gift, but he still very young and inexperienced. To place such lofty expectations on a 22 year old is unrealistic. </p>
<p>Although&#8230;Fernando was only 21 in 1982 and went 19-12 with a 2.87 ERA, while pitching 285 innings (WOW!) in 37 starts. I can&#8217;t see Kershaw recreating that type of season, but it could happen.</p>
<p>Keep up the great posts everybody, this is the best Dodger fan site anywhere. Happy Holidays to everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/12/dateline-october-4-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-19843</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=6941#comment-19843</guid>
		<description>Allrighty then. We are done.

But, I understand you cook books too? We can talk about that later.

I just heard a rumor that the Dodgers have made some internal hires that are actually good gnuz.

oops, Mark just posted it. So, there you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allrighty then. We are done.</p>
<p>But, I understand you cook books too? We can talk about that later.</p>
<p>I just heard a rumor that the Dodgers have made some internal hires that are actually good gnuz.</p>
<p>oops, Mark just posted it. So, there you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

