<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dog Ate My Homework!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/11/the-dog-ate-my-homework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/11/the-dog-ate-my-homework/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t drink the Kol-Aid - See a Different Game</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:59:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/11/the-dog-ate-my-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-19240</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=6763#comment-19240</guid>
		<description>&quot;With fans concerned despite repeated assurances of &quot;business as usual,&quot; the Dodgers plan to make what Grossman called &#039;very positive announcements . . . in the near future.&#039; &quot;

http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-mccourts26-2009nov26,0,5129011.story

We shall see about that. I read at dodgerdivorce.com this morning that the hearing for the postnup is December 15th. Not sure how positive announcements regarding player signings can be made before that date, but, we can hope. 

I haven&#039;t read any seriouis rumors anywhere involving Dodgers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With fans concerned despite repeated assurances of &#8220;business as usual,&#8221; the Dodgers plan to make what Grossman called &#8216;very positive announcements . . . in the near future.&#8217; &#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-mccourts26-2009nov26,0,5129011.story" rel="nofollow">http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-mccourts26-2009nov26,0,5129011.story</a></p>
<p>We shall see about that. I read at dodgerdivorce.com this morning that the hearing for the postnup is December 15th. Not sure how positive announcements regarding player signings can be made before that date, but, we can hope. </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read any seriouis rumors anywhere involving Dodgers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooklyn Dodger</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/11/the-dog-ate-my-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-19239</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooklyn Dodger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=6763#comment-19239</guid>
		<description>Of course, it&#039;s inevitable that even with an edit/preview I will still make errors, and then REALLY look stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, it&#8217;s inevitable that even with an edit/preview I will still make errors, and then REALLY look stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Timmons</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/11/the-dog-ate-my-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-19238</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Timmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=6763#comment-19238</guid>
		<description>If I put in an edit button, it will make you all look smarter and thus, make me look more stupid.  NO WAY!  ;)

Actually, We will update the software by Spring and hope to add that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I put in an edit button, it will make you all look smarter and thus, make me look more stupid.  NO WAY!  <img src='http://www.ladodgertalk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Actually, We will update the software by Spring and hope to add that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooklyn Dodger</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/11/the-dog-ate-my-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-19237</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooklyn Dodger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=6763#comment-19237</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s my understanding that Edwin Jackson is available because the Tigers are attempting to pare as much payroll as possible. He made $2.2 million in 2009, and with a little over 3 years service is now arbitration eligible. Given the year he had in 2009, he&#039;s probably in line for a hefty raise, and the Tigers are probably looking to replace him with talented, but cheaper players. 

When I heard the Sherrill for Jackson rumors earlier this offseason, I couldn&#039;t understand why the Tigers would want to do that deal. And I&#039;m guessing that I was right. However, throw in McDonald and Elbert (or their equivalents), and perhaps the Tigers would be interested, or at least near interested. Actually, I&#039;m not sure they would want Sherrill, since I think he may also be arbitration eligible (unless the Tigers thought they could turn him around in another deal).

Of course, I haven&#039;t seen Jackson pitch since he left the Dodgers, but he&#039;s put up good numbers since leaving, and his stats indicate that his control is much improved. Maybe my opinion would change after I saw him pitch a few times, but right now he sounds like someone I would like to see in our rotation. Is it doable? I haven&#039;t a clue.

By the way, in reading my previous two posts, I like others, long for an edit/preview button. It would make me feel less stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s my understanding that Edwin Jackson is available because the Tigers are attempting to pare as much payroll as possible. He made $2.2 million in 2009, and with a little over 3 years service is now arbitration eligible. Given the year he had in 2009, he&#8217;s probably in line for a hefty raise, and the Tigers are probably looking to replace him with talented, but cheaper players. </p>
<p>When I heard the Sherrill for Jackson rumors earlier this offseason, I couldn&#8217;t understand why the Tigers would want to do that deal. And I&#8217;m guessing that I was right. However, throw in McDonald and Elbert (or their equivalents), and perhaps the Tigers would be interested, or at least near interested. Actually, I&#8217;m not sure they would want Sherrill, since I think he may also be arbitration eligible (unless the Tigers thought they could turn him around in another deal).</p>
<p>Of course, I haven&#8217;t seen Jackson pitch since he left the Dodgers, but he&#8217;s put up good numbers since leaving, and his stats indicate that his control is much improved. Maybe my opinion would change after I saw him pitch a few times, but right now he sounds like someone I would like to see in our rotation. Is it doable? I haven&#8217;t a clue.</p>
<p>By the way, in reading my previous two posts, I like others, long for an edit/preview button. It would make me feel less stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

