<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Manny Get Wood On The Ball?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/07/will-manny-get-wood-on-the-bat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/07/will-manny-get-wood-on-the-bat/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t drink the Kol-Aid - See a Different Game</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:59:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Timmons</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/07/will-manny-get-wood-on-the-bat/comment-page-1/#comment-13973</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Timmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=5405#comment-13973</guid>
		<description>By way of comparison, C-Bill aveaged 5.8 BB per 9 on his first year and dropped it to 3.9 the 2nd, then 3.6 the 3rd.  He&#039;s at 4.1 this year.

When the Dodgers sent Clayton down last year, he dropped his BB/9 to 2.8 at JAX, but pitching in the minors really is not something I think will help him.  Billingsley walks too many batters too, should we send him down?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By way of comparison, C-Bill aveaged 5.8 BB per 9 on his first year and dropped it to 3.9 the 2nd, then 3.6 the 3rd.  He&#8217;s at 4.1 this year.</p>
<p>When the Dodgers sent Clayton down last year, he dropped his BB/9 to 2.8 at JAX, but pitching in the minors really is not something I think will help him.  Billingsley walks too many batters too, should we send him down?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Timmons</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/07/will-manny-get-wood-on-the-bat/comment-page-1/#comment-13972</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Timmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=5405#comment-13972</guid>
		<description>Of course, Tim Lincecum pitched in college, which slows your development because you play many fewer games each year.  In Lincecum&#039;s 1st year, he averaged 4.0 BB per 9 innings pitched.  In Clayton&#039;s fisrt year he averaged 4.3 BB per 9 innings pitched.   This year it is up to 5.3, but in many respects (other than number of pitches) he is better than last year.  He has a 3.49 ERA (and falling) and it&#039;s insane to send a guy that good back down so that he can learn better control.  He&#039;ll learn that here and learn it aginst better hitters.  We also don&#039;t have anyone better for the rotation.  He some repects he&#039;s our #2.  We have to hope that he can grow into that role after the All-Star break.

Roger,

I haven&#039;t brought myself to cut them open yet.  That look too good to eat!  But I will...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, Tim Lincecum pitched in college, which slows your development because you play many fewer games each year.  In Lincecum&#8217;s 1st year, he averaged 4.0 BB per 9 innings pitched.  In Clayton&#8217;s fisrt year he averaged 4.3 BB per 9 innings pitched.   This year it is up to 5.3, but in many respects (other than number of pitches) he is better than last year.  He has a 3.49 ERA (and falling) and it&#8217;s insane to send a guy that good back down so that he can learn better control.  He&#8217;ll learn that here and learn it aginst better hitters.  We also don&#8217;t have anyone better for the rotation.  He some repects he&#8217;s our #2.  We have to hope that he can grow into that role after the All-Star break.</p>
<p>Roger,</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t brought myself to cut them open yet.  That look too good to eat!  But I will&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/07/will-manny-get-wood-on-the-bat/comment-page-1/#comment-13971</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=5405#comment-13971</guid>
		<description>Furcal looks good. Manny? eh. It will take him a while but it would appear the team is energized.

Just checked the S.F. box - they are 14 for 28 with 13 runs scored in 5 innings. Yoiks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Furcal looks good. Manny? eh. It will take him a while but it would appear the team is energized.</p>
<p>Just checked the S.F. box &#8211; they are 14 for 28 with 13 runs scored in 5 innings. Yoiks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2009/07/will-manny-get-wood-on-the-bat/comment-page-1/#comment-13970</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladodgertalk.com/?p=5405#comment-13970</guid>
		<description>Manny is back, and the Dodgers are now playing like they did back in April.  Getting those runs early.  Martin came through.

I said the other day here, that Kershaw should try a few innings and just throw strikes.  That just might get most of the hitters knowing they have to swing, and they might not dig in as deep.

Mark, how were the cookies?  Did you get any?  Or did you son eat them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manny is back, and the Dodgers are now playing like they did back in April.  Getting those runs early.  Martin came through.</p>
<p>I said the other day here, that Kershaw should try a few innings and just throw strikes.  That just might get most of the hitters knowing they have to swing, and they might not dig in as deep.</p>
<p>Mark, how were the cookies?  Did you get any?  Or did you son eat them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

